*Thank you Brandon Cheshire for the graphic.
Follow Us
 |
 |
 |
Subscribe by Email
ASK THE INTACTIVISTS
Google Website Translator Gadget
Link to Us
<a href="http://www.intactivist.net/">
<img src="http://i817.photobucket.com/albums/zz98/NaturalMamaNZ/intactivistbutton5.png"
alt="Alternative Name" /></a>
*To link copy and paste the code into your website sidebar.
Contact
Popular Posts
Blog ArchivePopular Labels
agreement
anger
apology
baby
betrayal
bill
blog
care
child circumcision
circumcised
circumcision
Colin Farrell. Howard Stern
comparison
complications
consent
cut
cut vs uncut
damage
doctors
education
facebook
foreskin
Frank O'Hara
function
genitals
glans
history
hospital
infant
infant circumcision
intact
intactivists
interview
Jewish
JH Kellogg
Kellogg
keratinization
letter
letter to son
man
masturbation
medical
Milah
mother
mothers
mutilation
natural
no circ
normal
normal penis
normal skin
pain
parents
penis
pledge
poem
prepuce
proper
protect
protection
regret
religion
restoration
retract
Ron Low
San Fransisco
scar
scar tissue
sex
sexual
son
story
surgery
TLC Tugger
trauma
uncut
US Constitution
video
|
Links We Love
|
Progressive Parenting Radio
Followers
|
Contributors |
2 comments:
In my opinion, the frenulum is the most evident visual detail distinguishing cut from intact and retracted.
Ditto that. The cut one looks dead, literally as if on a corpse. The uncut looks alive and reactive. Hell, it could be its own organism if it were detached lol. Just for frenulum remnant in can derive pleasure enough for orgasm alone and thats just a thread, now compare that to the full delta of the intact guy. I could only dream of the pleasure that that guy can experience alongside a ridged band.
Post a Comment