Send us an EMAIL.
Popular Posts
Popular Labels
agreement
anger
apology
baby
betrayal
bill
blog
care
child circumcision
circumcised
circumcision
Colin Farrell. Howard Stern
comparison
complications
consent
cut
cut vs uncut
damage
doctors
education
facebook
foreskin
Frank O'Hara
function
genitals
glans
history
hospital
infant
infant circumcision
intact
intactivists
interview
Jewish
JH Kellogg
Kellogg
keratinization
letter
letter to son
man
masturbation
medical
Milah
mother
mothers
mutilation
natural
no circ
normal
normal penis
normal skin
pain
parents
penis
pledge
poem
prepuce
proper
protect
protection
regret
religion
restoration
retract
Ron Low
San Fransisco
scar
scar tissue
sex
sexual
son
story
surgery
TLC Tugger
trauma
uncut
US Constitution
video
|
|
Followers |
Contributors |
4 comments:
In my opinion, the frenulum is the most evident visual detail distinguishing cut from intact and retracted.
Ditto that. The cut one looks dead, literally as if on a corpse. The uncut looks alive and reactive. Hell, it could be its own organism if it were detached lol. Just for frenulum remnant in can derive pleasure enough for orgasm alone and thats just a thread, now compare that to the full delta of the intact guy. I could only dream of the pleasure that that guy can experience alongside a ridged band.
Frenulum has lots of sex-sensitive nerve endings, as well as the foreskin, about some 4000 the two of them.By circumcision those nerve endings dissappear forever,and while nobody denies cut guys achieve very good sex pleasure, uncut ones,we do have incredibel sexual sensations in the whole variet of normal sexual practices!
The man I'm with now has barely any remnant at all, it's like they grooved the whole thing out. I know how sensitive that area is in intact men and I feel so bad for him that he is missing out on that experience.
Post a Comment